News
 
Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

Carjacking can be a terrifying crime for the victims. Recently, in Houston, police released video of how a woman and her 11-month-old niece were dragged from a minivan in the daylight as shots were fired nearby Police appealed for witnesses in the Houston carjacking.

Houston police released the shocking surveillance last October, reported KXAN. The footage featured four men running from a car that was at a standstill in a ditch toward the minivan.

The KXAN report noted one of the men fired a gun at the car as they ran in from the 6800 block of London St. on the south side of Houston. A man was killed and another was wounded.

A report on KPRC stated security video acquired by police from a nearby motel showed two men in the front yard of a nearby house. One started running as a stolen Mazda pulled up. Four gunmen were inside already shooting from the car. However, the driver drove into a drainage ditch.

The men ran out of the disabled car. As one approached Cullen Boulevard, three others ran up to a dark green Kia Sedona parked close by. The TV channel report said the woman in the minivan was there to pick up a friend at the motel.

The woman was forced out of the car at gunpoint by one of the men. The video footage showed her tumbling to the ground. She clutched the baby in her car seat.

Police said neither the woman who was in the car nor the baby was harmed in the incident. Two men at the scene were not so lucky.

One of the men targeted by the gunmen, 22-year-old Walter Fields, was wounded but is expected to survive police said. The second victim, Sam Johnson, 53, was killed at the scene.  Johnson worked as a handyman at a nearby convenience store. Fellow employees speculated he had been in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Houston police arrested Mertroy Harris, 27 on murder charges and searched for three others.

Carjacking is a very serious crime in Texas. It is often accompanied by extreme violence.

In 2017, in Houston, 47-year-old Pedro Aguilar, was killed in a botched carjacking attempt. A report on Associated Press stated the carjackers attempted to take the family’s car only to discover it had a manual transmission and they were unable drive it.

The Harris County Sheriff’s Department stated Aguilar pulled up at his family’s apartment. Another car pulled alongside him with at least two suspects in the vehicle. They dragged Aguilar from his vehicle and beat him before shooting him in the chest. He died at the scene of the attempted carjacking.

The offense of carjacking is defined by Texas law as the taking of a vehicle from the owner or driver by force or the threat of force. The owner may fear often violence. In Texas, carjacking is prosecuted under the state’s robbery law. The owner should be in or in close proximity to the vehicle for the offense to take place. The charge cannot be brought for the taking of an empty car.

If you have been charged with carjacking, please call our Tarrant County criminal defense lawyers today.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

A new law allowing DWI convictions to be sealed in some cases has been in effect in Texas for more than three months. Although it will take time to gauge the effectiveness of this law, it’s likely to mean offenders will be given opportunities they would not otherwise have been afforded.

A recent conducted by Arizona State University found that applicants with criminal histories were the least likely to be hired.

That’s hardly rocket science, but even a first DWI can prove very detrimental to your future. Texas’ new ‘Second Chance’ law was enacted in September 2017.

It’s retroactive, but those who wish to take advantage of the law must meet strict criteria.

Only first-time DWI offenders with low-level, criminal histories that don’t include violent crimes can apply. For a DWI offense to be eligible for a second chance, the offender’s blood alcohol content must be at .14 or less, and the driver cannot have caused an accident or an injury.

Offenders must have completed all court requirements and orders.

The new law gives offenders an additional incentive to follow through with the terms of their court orders. Their records may be sealed even sooner if they fit an ignition interlock device on their vehicle.

The ignition interlock clause meant the ‘second chance’ law attracted the support of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD).

MADD and the Texas Public Policy Foundation supported the boosting of the Texas ignition interlock law. Greg Glod, Senior Policy Analyst for the Texas Public Policy Foundation said:

“I applaud Governor Abbott for signing HB 3016, a bill that will make our roads safer and allow individuals who have paid their debt to society move past their one criminal offense and become a productive citizen.”

Drivers who use an ignition interlock device for six months and comply with the other requirements of the new law can apply for a non-disclosure. The second chance law means the DWI would be removed from their record, although police officers would still be able to find it.

A drunk driving offender in Texas who is not ordered to fit an interlock, or a driver who chooses not to install the device, must wait five years before becoming eligible to apply for non-disclosure. At present, the courts in Texas cannot consider a previous DWI that occurred more than five years ago when sentencing intoxicated drivers.

A report on ABC News noted the Harris County D.A.’s office looks at each request for sealing a D.W.I. conviction on a case by case basis. It will challenge requests if in the public interest.

If you have been charged with a DWI in the Fort Worth area, it’s important to hire a veteran DWI defense attorney to help you. Please call us today for a free consultation about your case.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

With a record number of Americans becoming addicted and dying of opiate addiction, the federal authorities are targeting opiate crimes.

In October, President Donald Trump declared the opioid epidemic an emergency. However, he offered few concrete policies on the issue.

In 2016 alone, the opioid crisis killed more than 64,000 Americans, reported the Los Angeles Times.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions offered more specifics in November. For the first time in two decades, the Drug Enforcement Administration is to open a new field office, Sessions announced. The heat is on opiate crimes.

Jeff Sessions said the DEA’s 22nd field office would be located in Louisville in Kentucky, which is in a region seeing numerous overdoses of the prescription painkiller and heroin as well as the deadly synthetic drug fentanyl.

Sessions said at least 90 federal drug agents will be redeployed to the Louisville office. They will conduct anti-opioid operations throughout Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee.

A report in USA Today noted Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is reviewing whether to pursue a repeal of 2016 legislation backed by the drug industry that harmed law enforcement’s ability to stop suspicious shipments of opioids linked to rises in overdose deaths.

The suspicious sale of opioids is being monitored as well as prescription patterns by doctors.

A report of the Criminal Justice Police Foundation noted opioid overdoses have reached record highs. The report said:

“To expand treatment, we must increase funding for and acceptance of medication-assisted treatment. To reduce overdose deaths, we need Good Samaritan and naloxone access laws. To reduce disease transmission, we need to expand needle exchange programs.”

While the so-called “pill mills” are being targeted, the report noted many opiates were not being wrongly prescribed.

It said over-prescription by well-intentioned doctors was a significant problem and even a small decline in prescriptions pushed hundreds of thousands of patients to buy opioids illegally on the street. As doctors cut prescriptions, more patients are likely to turn to the street market and to end up on heroin.

On June 9, 2017, in Texas, Governor Greg Abbot signed a bill from the legislature amending both the Texas Controlled Substances Act and the Texas Pharmacy Practice Act.

The law adds a new section to the TCSA requiring pharmacists to check the Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) before dispensing certain drugs, including opioids, benzodiazepines and barbiturates.

There are a wide range of drug crimes. The new crackdown raises the prospect of more doctors and others facing criminal sanctions.

If you have been charged with a narcotics offense in Tarrant County, please call us today for a free consultation about your case.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

 

Drug trafficking is an extremely serious crime in Texas and other states. Drug trafficking and distribution is likely to result in a long prison sentence and a heavy fine on conviction.

The amount and type of drug involved will also have an impact on the eventual sentence.

Texas has a Controlled Substances Act. This legislation bans the manufacturing or distributing of prohibited substances with the intent to deliver to another person.

Different penalty groups are set out for different drugs. If, for instance, you are caught in possession of more than 400 grams of heroin or methamphetamine, you will face 15 years to life in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.

Drug trafficking and distribution is often dealt with in the federal courts. Trafficking essentially means selling or distributing illegal drugs.

If you bring narcotics across the United States border from Mexico to Texas to sell or distribute the drug, it is a federal offense.

Bringing drugs into the United States from another country has very severe penalties. However, it’s also a federal offense to cross state borders with drugs. This crime is also known as interstate trafficking, with the intent to sell. Even trafficking, or moving drugs within a state, can be charged as a federal offense with very tough sanctions.

Federal offenses and punishments can be found in the federal Controlled Substances Act.

These laws were enacted to target drug dealers as well as manufacturers of substances like heroin, methamphetamines, and opiate drugs.

Major federal drug busts often make headlines in Texas. In January 2017, two brothers from Beaumont were convicted in federal court of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 280 grams or more of crack cocaine. They faced a prison sentence of 10 years to life.

Given the uncompromising nature of Texas’ drug laws, it’s vital to hire an experienced criminal defense lawyer if you have been charged with a crime of this nature.

As a former assistant district attorney in Tarrant County, Gary Medlin can accurately assess the strength of the case against you and challenge the evidence and how it was obtained.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

During court proceedings, both sides can make requests to the judge. These are known as motions in criminal cases.  Motions can be made in a written format or orally.

Motions include such requests to dismiss certain charges, to set a different date for a trial and even to dismiss a case completely.

On the courtroom TV dramas, we often see each side submitting repeated motions to the judge during the trial.

However, motions can be made before a trial, during the hearing, or even after a trial. The initial stage of a motion involves giving notice to the opposing party of the intent to file a motion. Attorneys should not randomly file motions. There should be legal precedent and reasoning put forward before a motion can be filed.

After the filing of a motion, there will be a hearing giving each side the opportunity to make arguments for and against it.

Both sides can make arguments for or against the motion. Sometimes the attorneys will reach an agreement about certain facts and issues. This is called a stipulation. Courts favor stipulations because they speed up the issue but they typically need to be approved by a judge.

Defendants are not given complete control over motions, especially those made during a trial.

Motions in criminal cases are either pretrial motions, trial motions or post-trial motions.

Pretrial Motions

Motions made before a criminal trial may include:

  • The dismissal of the case
  • The reduction of a bail amount
  • Reduction of charges or the dismissal of certain charges;
  • A change of the trial venue
  • Examination of police evidence
  • The exclusion of drug paraphernalia evidence in a drug case;
  • The exclusion of an improperly obtained confession;
  • Dismissal of prior convictions

Trial Motions

Numerous motions may be made during the course of a trial. They include:

  • A motion to strike when a judge may order the jury to discount evidence it heard.
  • A motion to allow the judge and jury to view the crime scene;
  • A motion seeking the dismissal of the prosecution evidence

If these motions are to be approved, they must be supported by evidence from the defense. An experienced criminal defense lawyer will be familiar with how to file a successful motion.

Post-Trial Motions

If a jury returns a not guilty verdict, the prosecution cannot file a motion to retry the case under any circumstances.

If the jury finds a defendant guilty, the defense can file a wide number of post-trial motions. A motion to overturn the jury verdict may be filed, although this is rarely successful.

The defense may seek a re-trial or make a motion to the judge to appeal the case to a higher court.

Motions are a very important part of the criminal justice process. If you have been charged with a crime in Tarrant County call us today for a free consultation about your case.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

The number of arrests of women has fallen in Texas but the state’s female prison population is growing.

This curious fact was recently highlighted in a Dallas Morning News investigation in the summer of 2017 about what happens to children after a mother’s arrest.

The investigation found that the number of women in county jails across that state who are awaiting trial has risen about 50 percent since 2011, reported KUT 95.

Investigative reporter Cary Aspinwall told the Texas Standard.

“I think when we first told people that the volume of women in jails was going up, they assumed it was part of a crime wave. But what we know, if you look at Department of Public Safety data and those crime stats that come out every year that are part of the FBI data, there’s actually been a decrease in most crime categories, in most violent crime categories.”

Aspinwall said although the statistic seems contradictory, there are clear reasons why the female prison population is rising.

She said people are remaining longer in jail because they can’t make bail. On occasions, defendants go to jail and there’s not necessarily an arrest that would count because there is no new crime.

Aspinwall said many women languish in jail for failing to pay fines to the court, appearing late to a court hearing, or a probation violation. She said:

“So it doesn’t count as a new crime, or a new arrest, but you end up back in jail just the same.”

Given some of the concerns over the bail system in places like Harris County, it’s alarming that female prisoners are spending long periods in jail for minor offenses.

In 2016, The Houston Chronicle revealed many inmates remain in Harris County Jail due to their poverty, even on charges for minor crimes. They were unable to make bail.

Inmates in Texas’ most populated county filed suit against Harris County, saying they were wrongfully kept in jail simply because they were too impoverished to pay their bail bonds. The lawsuit applies to all indigent defendants arrested on misdemeanors such as shoplifting or driving with an invalid license.

The federal lawsuit which was discussed by the courts in late 2017 questions the constitutionality of the county’s pretrial system.

The Texas Tribune reported U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal issued a ruling in April 2017 that stated Harris County’s bail practices were unconstitutional. He ordered the release of almost all misdemeanor defendants from jail within 24 hours of arrest, irrespective of their ability to pay the bond amount.

If you are charged with any crime in Texas, you may spend long periods incarcerated, particularly if you are poor. It’s important to hire an experienced criminal defense lawyer.Please call us today for a free consultation about your case.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

When serious crimes occur a teen offender may be tried as an adult. This was the case in late 2017 with a 16-year-old Fort Worth youth accused of killing a teen with a hammer.

A report on WFAA stated Judge Tim Menikos reached the decision over Jordon Roache after a four-hour hearing

Roache is accused of using a hammer to kill a Bedford teen. He was certified to stand trial as an adult.

Jordin Roache was rushed out of the courtroom Wednesday afternoon after Judge Tim Menikos reached his decision following an almost four-hour hearing in December.

An attorney for Roache argued that the teen would be held more accountable in a juvenile facility than in the adult system if he was found guilty.

He also reportedly questioned Bedford detectives about the prospects of locating another suspect in the brutal killing of 14-year-old Kaytlynn Cargill, a teen whose body was found in an Arlington landfill over the summer.

Bedford detective Anthony Shelley confirmed the case remains under investigation.

The 16-year-old was arrested at O.D. Wyatt High School in Fort Worth, stated his arrest warrant.

The warrant, obtained by the TV station NBC 5, said the 14-year-old was involved in a drug transaction when she disappeared. The suspect lived in the same apartment complex as the victim.

Investigators said they found the girl’s blood on a hammer in the boy’s room.

Cargill disappeared on June 18, 2017, when she was walking her dog in the Oak Creek West Apartments in Bedford where she lived with her family.

Her body was discovered two days later at an Arlington dump on Mosier Valley Road. The Tarrant County Medical examiner ruled the girl’s death was caused by homicidal violence. He was able to offer few additional details.

In Texas, 17-year-old offenders are treated as adults. In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences for teens without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders are unconstitutional.

However, the high court also permitted states to impose life sentences for juvenile offenders who are “irreparably corrupt” and “permanently incorrigible.”

Teens who have committed serious crimes like murder may be tried as adults in Texas and face the prospect of imprisonment in places intended to punish rather than rehabilitate offenders.

If you have been charged with a crime as a teen your life may be ruined at an early age. Please call us today for a free consultation about your case.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

Bail reform has been enacted in a number of states. The momentum is likely to continue into 2018 as more legislatures retreat from cash bail systems.

Ohio has joined the list of states considering bail reform. Legislation was introduced by two Ohio state representatives in late December. It could lead to fewer defendants being held in the state’s jails merely because they can’t afford the cost of bail.

Rep. Jonathan Dever of Madeira and Rep. Timothy Ginter of Salem, both Republicans, submitted a bill that would require Ohio courts to use the results of a risk assessment tool as an element of their bail-setting decisions, noted Cleveland.com.

In the past, judges relied on the nature of a crime when setting bail. However, new methods of evaluating defendants would allow courts to more effectively predict whether those defendants pose a flight risk or a danger to the community.

New Jersey was one of the first states to enact a comprehensive bail reform. A report in 2013 by the Drug Policy Alliance found three-quarters of people detained in New Jersey’s jails were awaiting trial rather than serving a sentence. Of these individuals, 40 percent were imprisoned because they could not afford the money bail set on them, reported NorthJersey.com.

In New Jersey, a majority of voters passed an amendment to the state’s Constitution in 2014 giving prosecutors the power to put newly arrested defendants on pretrial detention effective Jan. 1, 2017. The change eliminated the constitutional right to bail.

High-risk offenders can no longer get out of jail by paying money. The change means impoverished small-time offenders no longer remain behind bars because of their inability to post bail.

In New Jersey, bail hearings where judges decided how much money was required to ensure defendants’ future appearances in court were overhauled for detention hearings.

The risk-assessment implemented by the state judiciary ranks the potential risk of a defendant failing to show up in court and re-offending on a scale of 1 to 6.

The cash bail system also came under fire in Texas in 2017. A federal judge ruled that Harris County wrongfully held poor defendants charged with misdemeanors in jail while awaiting trial.

U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal stated nearly all defendants in Harris County accused of misdemeanor offenses must be released from jail within 24 hours of their arrests, irrespective of their financial ability to post bond.

The case is presently being appealed in the federal courts. In the summer of 2017, the county switched to a nationally accredited bail system based on risk. Low-risk offenders who are thought to be likely to stay out of trouble and attend court hearings are routinely released on a no-cost “personal bond,” whether they have finances or not.

The world of cash bail is likely to change rapidly in 2018. If you have been charged with an offense, it makes sense to contact a Tarrant County criminal defense lawyer today.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

Key changes and criminal justice reforms were seen in 2017 as a new administration took a tough stance on crime and immigration.

The arrival of the Trump administration meant the appointment of a new attorney general. Jeff Sessions outlined a tough approach to offenses like drug crimes. He directed federal prosecutors to seek the harshest charges possible in criminal cases.

Sessions said prosecutors must charge the most serious “readily provable offense.”

Other changes saw a scaling down of police department investigations and the end of the National Commission on Forensic Science, a partnership between the Justice Department and independent scientists to investigate the effectiveness of forensic methods.

Some progressive criminal justice reforms were enacted in certain states, reported The Root.

In 2017, legislation was passed in New York and California to raise the age for which a juvenile is treated as an adult in the criminal justice system. The two states will no longer automatically prosecute 16- and 17-year-olds as adults.

Instead, teenagers in these two states may be processed in the juvenile-justice system.

Opponents of treating teens as adults say the system is aimed at punishment whereas juvenile justice systems have a greater emphasis on rehabilitation.

In Texas, 17-year-olds are processed in the adult criminal justice system. However, a movement to raise the age of adult criminal responsibility has resulted in unsuccessful legislation in the state legislature.

Also in 2017, the Supreme Court ruled, twice, that the sentencing of juveniles to life without parole is unconstitutional. Many states agreed to end this practice and to resentence inmates locked up before the landmark decisions.

In the landmark Texas case of Bobby Moore, the Supreme Court challenged the Texas definition of intellectual disability as outdated. Prisoners who are intellectually disabled should not face the death penalty. However, Moore from Houston faced execution despite challenges such as not being able to tell the time or understand the days of the week and the months of the year.

The Supreme Court took aim at the Texas standard. In a 5-3 ruling, it determined that the state did not properly consider whether Moore was too intellectually disabled to face execution.

The ruling set off numerous requests from inmates wanting their death sentences overturned in exchange for life in prison. At least 10 condemned killers from across the state are pursuing lesser punishments, a course prosecutors later agreed on in Moore’s case.

Please call us today if you have been charged with a criminal offense in Tarrant County.

Gary Medlin
Pin on Pinterest

Texas again led the nation in the number of executions carried out in 2017 but the death row population of the state is falling.

The decline in inmates on Texas’ death row continues a decades-long trend, reported the Texas Tribune.

It’s a trend predominantly caused by fewer new death sentences and an increase in reduced punishments in recent years, according to information released at the end of 2017 by opponents of the death penalty in Texas and across the country.

But Texas still held more executions than any other state. Texas executed seven men in 2017. The figure was high enough to top the national table but is a record low since the reintroduction of the death penalty in 1976, tying with 2016.

Opponents of the death penalty say it’s facing more scrutiny than ever before. Kristin Houlé, executive director of the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty said:

“Prosecutors, juries, judges, and the public are subjecting our state’s death penalty practices to unprecedented scrutiny. In an increasing number of cases, they are accepting alternatives to this flawed and irreversible punishment.”

The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation takes a different stance. It has supported death penalty practices throughout the country. Legal Director Kent Scheidegger agrees that the decline is down to shifting attitudes among prosecutors and jurors. However, he told the Tribune there has been a drop in the murder rate nationwide.

Texas accounted for 30 percent of the 23 executions carried out nationwide in 2017. Arkansas was second in the country with four.

The Tribune reported the state has 234 inmates on death row.   That number has been falling since 2003. The death row population peaked at 460 in 1999, stated the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

In 2017, a number of important appeals from death row prisoners led to death sentences being commuted to life.

In Texas, several death row inmates were executed despite doubts about their guilt. The state also saw high profile exonerations. Randall Dale Adams was convicted of killing a police officer. Another suspect bragged about the murder.

Police failed to question witnesses in Adams’ case because they disappeared after testifying. Adams’ conviction and death sentence was overturned. Prosecutors did not seek a new trial due to evidence of Adams’ innocence.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense in Fort Worth or elsewhere in Texas, call the Medlin Law Firm.